Wednesday Blue Ball Awareness Bulletin

Yes, your humble blogger is a blue ball survivor…

Survivor

Let’s end blue balls forever.  The human cost is too high.

There Goes My Trip To Mexico

The U.S. government actually admits they assassinate U.S. citizens when they leave the borders. (Hat tip: Vox Day).

Anyone willing to sneak the tequila across the border for me?

Anyone?

Serving Feminism

There are some among the MGTOW that see game, and seduction as serving the women, and in a sense this is true.  Men that practice game are giving women what they want in the short term.

However, MGTOW serves them in a similar way.

If the goal of feminism is the alienation of the sexes, then cutting yourself from women pushes that goal along because you are doing their work for them.

If it is to seperate the betas from the alphas by making it to difficult for betas to get sex (examples of this are the sexual harassment laws, the attitude that men should not notice women in blatantly sexual attire or respond accordingly) than taking yourself out of the system is what they desire.  You have become the chaff to the wheat they are seeking.

But MGTOW can cause a system wide collpase, and economic collapse.  Quite true, although most feminists don’t believe this.  However, this may be part of the design too.  It is much easier to impose absolute Big Brother Tyranny after a collapse than before it.

Men that learn game at an early age.  Men that are able to get sex without all the fights for credentialism, all the debt, all the striving to make money are just as effective at undermining the economic system as MGTOW.  There is no reason to go John Galt if you are a gamer, because there is no reason to become the man that decides to go John Galt.

Some people focus on the motives of game to attack it.  That somehow striving to be a better man, more interesting, more athletic, more capable of surviving is somehow lessened if the motive is not the right kind.

I don’t care what a man’s motives are.  MGTOW and gamers are both reacting to women, their response is in response to the culture and society they are in, but it is still a response.  It is still an adaptation, it is still a philosophy that is created out of the evil of feminism.

In the long term, both are part of a growing philosophy: that the interaction of men with women will be on the man’s terms, with the man in control of his destiny.  Nothing removes the idealization of women more than success with them.

As men, it is tempting to feel that what we believe is right, that our unique destiny is what’s right for all other men.  We should not be this way.   Our vision is one where men are in control of their relationships, their destiny, their choices.

We should be as good fathers to each other.  What does a good father do?  He teaches his son all the skills that he can, shows him the pitfalls, and he lets his children live their lives, make their own way, make their mistakes and suffer the consequences as well as the triumphs.

Affliction

What’s the opposite of sexual addiction?  Well, maybe not opposite.  Try this new diagnosis on for size…sexual anorexia.

sexual anorexia is “an obsessive state in which the physical, mental, and emotional task of avoiding sex dominates one’s life. Like self-starvation with food or compulsive dieting or hoarding with money, deprivation with sex can make one feel powerful and defended against all hurts.”

Talk about hang ups.

Women’s logic, or lack thereof

I’ve heard it from several women.  Usually after a man, either myself or the woman significant other, has pointed out to a woman that her position makes no sense.  The reply is always along the lines of, ‘It makes perfect sense, if you’re a woman.  It’s woman’s logic.’  As if that’s the end all, be all in reasoning.  Once that statement has been made, the woman is telling you all discussion is over as in her mind she’s won the argument.

For example, here’s one that I have seen used many a time.  Woman goes shopping with her friends.  She comes back to her husband and says, “Look at all the things I bought on sale, I saved you money.”  Now she knows damn well she spent a truck load of money shopping.  In her mind the money was already spent, so finding something on sale is saving money to her.  In reality the guy is thinking “she spent how much?”  The guy knows that his bank account is now short several hundred dollars, or if they have separate account, he knows he’s going to be asked to replenish her bank account as she’s now running a little short until the next payday.

I can’t think of anyone I know that doesn’t think that they can apply the rules of logic when they need them.  Most, including me, have never formally studied logic, and probably wouldn’t recognize any formal rules of logic if it smacked them in the head.  Some, including me, have done some personal study regarding the rules of logic and logical fallacies, but I would by no means call myself an expert.  Human beings are emotional creatures, as such we all allow our emotions to rule our thoughts from time to time.  Women, being the more emotional half of the species (not counting those men who’ve embraced their feminine side), tend to argue by logical fallacy thinking it is the same as logic.  Hence the catalog of shaming language.

Applied logic, by itself, does not inherently make any conclusions drawn valid.  I can’t remember if it was Aristotle or Plato who wrote something to the effect that if your assumptions are wrong, your conclusions do not follow.  My rule of thumb when in an argument, debate, or discussion with a woman is to always try to start with their underlying assumptions.  Ask the probing questions.  Let them hoist themselves on their own petard.  It is often easier to attack the foundations of their argument then to try to go toe to toe with women’s logic.

The Two Friends

I knew two friends that grew up together.  Call them Green and Blue, just to make it easier.  When they were young they were inseparable.  Whatever Green did, Blue was part of.

Green listened to Blue.  He trusted Blue and whenever he had doubts he would talk to his friend about what was troubling him and he would come to a decision.  Sometimes Green didn’t like what Blue would tell him, that’s the way of things with good friends.  Sometimes you tell each other the truth because that’s what friends do.

When the teenage years started, Green and Blue didn’t see things quite the same, but they still got along.  They still hung out together, they were still friends, just not as inseparable.  Still when there was trouble, the two friends were there together facing it.

Blue started to get more liberal as the years went by.  Green didn’t think too much about it, for Green politics weren’t that important.  Sure there were issues he felt strongly about, but he was more interesting in doing other things.  Blue was active in politics, though Blue would deny it.  Green and Blue were starting to disagree about things.  Blue would say that Green had changed, but Green wasn’t sure and didn’t see it that way.

When Green got married, Blue was there, and very proud.  Blue gave Green all sorts of advice about how to be a good husband and a good father and Green, like usual heeded Blue’s advice.

The years passed and although Green and Blue saw each other, they weren’t as tight as they once were.  In fact they became very distant.  Blue was still changing, still getting more liberal.  They were polite to each other, but sometimes they weren’t very civil even and Green started to dislike Blue.  Blue was blaming Green and people like Green for the way the world was.  Blue would say men like Green needed to step up, be responsible and be more like women.

Then Green was having marital troubles and eventually ended up divorced.  This caused a rift between Green and Blue, because Blue took the side of Green’s wife.  Blue believed that Green’s failings were responsible for what happened, there would be statements about how it took two to tango, but the underlying message was that it was Green’s fault.  It was more important to Blue to stay on the good side of Green’s wife and women like her.  Blue picked the women, over the men.

Well, the years went by and the women liked Blue.  It didn’t matter to Blue so much that Green wasn’t speaking or even looking in Blue’s direction.  Sure, it’d be nice to have Green back, but only if Green apologized.  Blue wasn’t very self-aware.

Eventually Blue had a wake up moment, maybe it was something bad that happened, who can know what did it?  Blue decided to change and reached out to Green, trying to renew their old friendship.  Problem was, as Blue used to point out it was one thing to forgive, but being forgiven did not end the consequences for one’s bad acts.  Green was polite to Blue, but that didn’t change their history.  It was going to take a lot more and a lot more time, if ever, for Green to return to anything like it was when he was young.

It will take more than this for men to come home.

Tuesday – Blue Ball awareness reminder

Her’s your daily reminder that Blue Balls are a serious health risk.

Find a Cure

Won’t you see it in you heart to donate to this worthy cause?

The sole constant of the protestant revolution

You say reformation, I say revolution, let’s start a bloody war to decide the matter.

Over the last couple of weeks the congregation the LTR grew up in voted on a resolution to leave the ELCA (that’s main line Lutheran in the United States  for those of you unaffiliated or who just could care less).  The vote failed coming up a double handful short of the required 2/3rds majority needed.  The reason for the vote can be found here.  The head pastor, and most of the congregants with money sent a figurative F.O.A.D. to the church and left blowing a huge hole in the congregation’s budget.  The result was inevitable.  The ELCA is chugging down the path to irrelevance, but that train left the station long ago.

So what is the sole constant of the protestant reformation?  That would be schism.  The ELCA claim their authority rests in a clear reading (yeah right) of the bible a la sola scriptura. The bible is the only infallible and inerrant authority for Christian faith.  Anyone can look at the multitude of denominations and see that it is not so cut and dried.  Interpretation is the key that unlocks the divisions that separate the protestants.  Luther and Calvin claimed the Catholic Magisterium was a artifice of the Roman Catholic Church and therefore untrustworthy and in fact a usurpation of God’s will.  Funny thing is it’s hard for me to see how their claimed proper interpretation aren’t the very thing they railed against.

The LTR doesn’t like to discuss her faith with me.  Mostly because it leaves her sputtering in disbelief and/or anger.  Women pastors or priestesses?  Divorced pastors?  Gay clergy?  All permissible because the bible was written by men.  She won’t come out and say it, but it’s obviously the feminist brainwashing of the patriarchy keeping women down.  She very clearly would like to discard all the harsher parts of the bible and retain all the inclusive lovey, hand holding, kum-ba-ya parts.  Honey, it just doesn’t work that way.

The feminine view has taken over the ELCA and the Episcopal church as well.  No longer is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit sufficient.  Changed to Mother, Daughter, and Womb.  Paul’s letters?  The tired rants of a woman hating, gay bashing zealot.  So where does this leave the ELCA and other faiths that have embraced the feminine view of Christianity?  Time will tell, but I suspect they will be on the dust heap of history, sooner rather than later.

A medical marvel

Look, it’s a cure for breasts that look like stockings full of wet sand.

In a traditional breast-lift or reduction, the newly-formed breast is held up by skin alone. About three years after the operation, the scars begin to stretch and the breasts start to sag.

But the new technique provides permanent built-in support and experts predict it could revolutionise the way breast reductions and lifts are performed in the UK.

The new system uses a mesh-like material called Breform, similar to that used in hernia operations for 40 years, to support the new shape, taking the strain off the scars and skin.

Putting the FUN back into fun bags.

The Rift

Little article saying that one in five people would rather spend valentines with their pet than their spouse, and in the younger demographic the stats are one in four.

A number of people are finding more love, loyalty and affection in their pets.  The rift between the genders continues to grow.  The alienation continues.

Western civilization is truly falling apart.